Sunday, 13 August 2017

Naming Plants! What I’ve learn from The Flora of New Zealand.

The current system of binomial nomenclature (meaning ‘two name’) was devised by the Swedish botanist, zoologist, and physician, Carl Linnaeus in 1753. This system uses a two-part name for the naming of plants, the first part is the genus, this is ALWAYS either underlined, or in italics and MUST be capitalised. The second part is the species, this is also always either underlined, or in italics however, it is not capitalised. For example, the scientific name for the Nikau palm is Rhopalostylis sapida. Rhopalostylis is the genus, and sapida is the species. The formal binomial also includes the authority, the person who first described the plant and published the name. This is often abbreviated, for example, Bellis perennis L. indicates that Linnaeus (abbreviated as L.) first described this plant and published the name.

If you discover a new species and wish to give it a formal name, there are a set of certain rules you must follow for your plant name to be accepted. These strict rules are outlined in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. Among the many rules are a few of the very basics including:
-        The name must be validly and effectively published. This means that the name and description of the plant must be published in a scientific journal which is accessible to the botanical community.
-        A type specimen must be lodged in a valid herbarium. A type specimen represents the original plant used to write the description for the new species, this must be dried and pressed and stored in a valid herbarium (kind of like a library for preserved plant bits).

Once these, and a few other, conditions are met then your chosen name will become valid for the newly discovered plant and you may go down in the history books as the authority for that discovery!

I hope you guys enjoyed learning about the naming of plants as much as I did! 

Saturday, 5 August 2017

Debate


“So let me begin by asking, what sort of nation do we want to build?

Is it to be a modern democratic society, embodying the essential notion of one rule for all in a single nation state?

Or is it the racially divided nation, with two sets of laws, and two standards of citizenship, that the present Labour Government is moving us steadily towards?”

“In both education and healthcare, government funding is now influenced not just by need – as it should be – but also by the ethnicity of the recipient.” Don Brash (leader of the National Party) said, during his Orewa speech in 2004.



This week’s topic for my blog post is based on the debate question: should there be measures to extend preventive health care for Maori, and should this be a top priority in the New Zealand government.



In an article named: Effects of self-reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Māori health and inequalities in New Zealand: cross-sectional study by R Harris, that based on their studies, Māori were more likely to report experiences of self-reported racial discrimination in all instances assessed and was almost ten times more likely to experience discrimination in three or more settings than were Europeans. And in another article published by the AJPH, said that there was a need to improve Maori health. They gave two potential approaches to improving access to and quality of health care for Maoris are (1) development of a system of Maori health care provider services and (2) initiation of cultural safety education.
Improving access to care is crucial to addressing health disparities, and increasing evidence suggests that Maoris and non-Maoris differ in terms of access to primary and secondary health care services.

Now, Don Brash is clearly against the measure to extend preventive health care for Maori, based upon his Orewa speech in 2004. And considering he was once the leader of the National Party, he believed it shouldn’t be a top priority in New Zealand government. On the other hand, the two articles I spoke about above, were based on surveys and studies and as their studies showed that there should be something put in place for Maori’ health care.



References:

NATIONHOOD - Don Brash Speech Orewa Rotary Club                                                         Tuesday, 27 January 2004, 8:29 pm                                                                                               Speech: New Zealand National Party

Harris, R. (2006). Effects of self-reported racial discrimination and deprivation on Maori health and inequalities in New Zealand: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 367(9527), 2005-2009.

Ellison-Loschmann. L., & Pearce, N. (2011).  Improving access to health care among New Zealand Maori population. The American Journal of Public health (AJPH).